Friday, 29 March 2013

The 31 Known Dimensions



    Today I asked my teacher... 



  • Chrissy Newbury
    what are they?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    This is a very good question my student.
    <<Puts on Sensei hat.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    <<< smiles and bows...
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    In Buddhist cosmology there are 31 realms and each realm represents a state of being.
    They are simply metaphors for different states of mind.
    Each "realm" is simply where you are mentally at any given time. 
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Oh... I understand.
    So where are you and I right now?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Alright....this might take a second to look up....it's a 2,000+ page book.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Got my parachute on.
    Ready?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    1. Hell realms
    2. Animal Realms
    3. Domain of ghosts
    4. Host of asuras.
    5. Human Realm
    6. Four Great Kings.
    7. Tavatisma Devas
    8. Yama devas
    9. Tusita devas
    10. Nimmanarati devas.
    11. Paranimmitavasavatti devas.
    12. Brahma's assembly
    13. Brahma's Ministers
    14. Mahabrahma Realm (Maha~"Great")
    15. Devas of minor radiance.
    16. Devas of measureless radiance.
    17. Devas of streaming radiance.
    18. Debas of minor aura.
    19. Devas of measureless aura.
    20. Devas of steady aura.
    21. Devas of great fruit. (I hear you giggling)
    22. Nonpercipient beings.
    23. Durable realm.
    24. Serene Realm
    25. Beautiful Realm
    26. Clear-sighted realm of perfect vision
    27. Akanittha Realm
    28. Base of the infinity of space.
    29. Base of the infinity of consciousness
    30. Base of Nothingness
    31. Base of neither perception nor Non-perception.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Whew... that will teach me to ask about such things...
    You are infinitely patient, my teacher.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I serve the Buddha and his Dharma and his Sangha.
    I can do not less. 
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Are they all of equal importance..? or do some require more (or less) understanding?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I think again that this is a good question.
    The realms themselves are just labels....what matters is your mind.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Of course...
    <<< nods
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Remember when I told you that the Buddha is sometimes called "the teacher of gods and men"...?
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Yes, I do...
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Well in Buddhism the Buddha is of course the "Awakened One"...that's what the word 'Buddha' means.
    Now..
    Early Buddhists....following the Buddha's lead stated that a Buddha, a fully enlightened human being is above a god (Deva).
    Why?
    Beecause:
    A god might have great powers, but a god is still subject to SAMSARA.
    A god is still just as trapped in "becoming" as we are....and so a god, a Deva, must also adapt the ways of he Buddha to pursue the path to enlightenment. The Buddha taught that it is actually harder for a Deva to achieve enlightenment because they see themselves as so superior.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    which I remember is a journey. The cycle of birth and death and rebirth. An illusion...
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I believe that in the real world "Devas" can be seen really as The Ruling Class....Celebrities....those with very great talents (and egos to go with them), etc.
    Consider the difficulty of teaching anyone in the royal family what I've been teaching you and you'll begin to see mypoint.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Oh... I see. 
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Very powerful men and women are like gods...and often see themselves that way...and tis makes it almost impossible for them to become enlightened.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Right. Yes. .. so how does this pertain to the 31 known dimensions... ?
    I am thinking it has something to do with state of mind... but whose?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    YOURS
    I might be wrong in my understanding....but I like to think of the realms as states of mind/feelings.
    When we are deeply depressed...are we not in Hell?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    When we feel a deep sense of disconnection...are we not ghosts?
  • Chrissy Newbury
    yes we are.
    and so on and so forth...
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    When we give in to instinct without thinking....to rage....are we not animals?
  • Chrissy Newbury
    hmmm... not sure about that one. But I do see where you are going with this.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    Really what we're looking at here is a kind of Proto-Psychology.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I think the early Buddhists used the trappings of Hinduism (gods, realms, reincarnation) as metaphor to explain and teach what the Buddha taught.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    That does make perfect sense.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    The danger is the uninitiated looking at all this and taking it in any way literally....
    But regardless you carry the 31 realms within you...
  • Chrissy Newbury
    I am learning NOT to take all things Buddhist as literal... 
    I love that... carrying the 31 realms inside me... and you. I really do...
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I was taught a long time ago that anything in Buddhism that even remotely sounds supernatural is a literary trope.
    That's why I explained to you the difference between Reincarnation(Hindu) and Rebirth(Buddhist).
    Remember?
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I notice modern Buddhists don't even bother with mentioning the 31 realms.
    They just rely on terms now used by Psychologists.
    "Depression"
    "Anger"
    "Resentment"
    etc etc
  • Chrissy Newbury
    That's why I asked you... I was sure there was more to it.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I like the idea myself....it acknowledges that we are all a Universe unto ourselves....it's very Jungian.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    That is a pretty wonderful concept too. 
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    I had a conversation along these lines with my therapist father and he said "Too bad we have nothing like that in our culture".
    I said:
    Gotham City.
    He said: "What?"
    I said: "Think about it. Gotham city is the human mind...and Batman is the Ego navigating it trying to maintain order and all of his 'villains' are just different manifestations of madness and insanity."
    Internally we are all The Dark Knight....trying to maintain order from madness...sorrow...despair.....rage....etc.
    What do you think?
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Well... I think... the only truth (mind) that we can be certain of is our own.. truth... I mean, what we ourselves feel and experience and understand. It can only be that that we as individuals have experienced... So in other words, our mind is our own universe. I think you are dead right and I really like the Gotham City allegory .. it's genius. "And so are you..."
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    My thanks.
    When Odysseus is told that to complete his journey he must "go into the Underworld" this is a line that is replete with meaning.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    Oh yes. I've always seen the metaphor in that scenario.
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    So you already understand. 
    Excellent.
  • Chrissy Newbury
    I actually think I do..!
  • Dan Hettmannsperger III
    You know you are such a delight to teach.



       

Understanding The Buddha's Teachings

Chapter 5


Is Everything Suffering?


If we are not careful, we may make the words of our teacher into a doctrine or ideology. Since the Buddha said that the First Noble Truth is suffering, many students have tried to prove that everything on Earth is suffering. This is not the teaching of the Buddha. 





  1. "Suffering of suffering" - (Dukkha Dukkhata): unpleasantness ie. toothache, losing your temper, feeling cold etc. 
  2. "Suffering of composite things" - (Samskara Dukkhata): what comes together has to (eventually) come apart. Therefore all composite things are suffering. Even things that have not yet decayed - mountains, rivers, the sun and stars - are suffering because they will decay and cause suffering eventually. So if you believe that all things composed are suffering, how can yo find joy? 
  3. "Suffering associated with change" - (Viparinama Dukkhata) ie. our lives may be healthy today, but when we age, it will cause us to suffer. There is no point in being joyous because eventually it will turn into suffering. Suffering is a black cloud that envelopes everything. Joy is an illusion. Only suffering is real. 


For over 2000 years, students of Buddhism have said that Buddha taught thall objects of perception are suffering. "This is suffering. Life is sufferinging. Everything is suffering."

Today, people evoke the names of the Buddha mechanically, believing this will lead to insight and emancipation. They are not using their intelligence. with regard to the Dharma. This can be dangerous if you don't ask your intelligence, without a teacher to guide you correctly. "Life is suffering" cannot help you understand the true nature of suffering or reveal the path shown to us by the Buddha. 

Re. Many sutras (canonical scriptures, dialogues, discourses):

Q. "Are conditioned things permanent or impermanent?"
A. "They are impermanent."

Q. "If things are permanent, are they suffering or well-being?!
A. "They are suffering."

Q. "If things are suffering, can we say that they are self or belong to self?"

A. "No."

So, if Buddha is offering a theory - ie. "All things are suffering" - that we have to prove in our daily life. But the Buddha only wants us to recognise suffering when it is present and to recognise joy when suffering is absent. 







The Argument. 


"Impermanent, therefore suffering, therefore nonself" is illogical. To put suffering on the same level as impermanence and nonself is an error. The are a "mark" of all things. Suffering is not. ie. a table is impermanent and does not have a self separate of all non-table elements - like wood, rain, sun, furniture makers etc. right up to the cloud (can you see the cloud?). But is it suffering> A table will only make us suffer if we attribute permanence or separateness to it. If we are attached to a specific table, we only suffer because of our attachment to it (not the table itself).

Anger is impermanent.. without a separate self, and filled with suffering, but it is strange to talk about a table or a flower as being filled with suffering. The Buddha taught impermanence and nonself to help us not be caught in signs. 

The theory of the three kinds of Suffering is an attempt to justify universal suffering. What joy is left in life> We find it in Nirvana (the joy of completely extinguishing our ideas and concepts rather than suffering, is one of the Three Dharma Seals. *See Samyukta Agama of the Northern Transmission. 

To the author, it is much easier to see a state where there are no obstacles created by concepts than to see all things as suffering. All things are marked by impermanence, nonself and Nirvana, and not make too great an effort to prove that everything is suffering. 

Another misconception of the Buddha's teaching is that all our suffering is caused by 'craving' - but only because craving is the first on the list of afflictions (Kleshas). I we use our intelligence, we can see that craving can cause pain, but other things like anger, ignorance, suspicion, arrogance and wrong views can also cause pain and suffering. Ignorance is responsible for much of our pain. 

"Eyes" > used in many sutras to represent all six sense organs and "Form" is used to represent all five Aggregates* (skanhas). The five functions or aspects that constitute the human being The Buddha teaches that nothing among them is really "I" or "mine".*
If we can identify the causes of our suffering, that sometimes it is due to craving or other factors.To say "life is suffering" is too general and "craving causes suffering" is too simplistic. We need to say, "the basis for this suffering is such and such an affliction", and call it by its true name ie. a stomach ache is a stomach ache or a headache is a headache. How else will we find the cause of our suffering and the way to heal ourselves?

The Buddha also taught the truth of "dwelling happily in things as they are" (Drishta Dharma Sukkha Viharin). 

Stop trying to prove everything is suffering!! 



   



Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Understanding the Buddha's Teachings


Chapter Four


When we hear a Dharma talk or study a sutra, our only job is to remain open. It's not about comparing it to our own ideas, accepting it and saying it's correct. Nor is it incorrect. In either case, we learn nothing. If we read or listen with an open mind and an open heart, "the rain of the Dharma will penetrate the soil of our consciences."

The gentle spring rain permeates the soil of my soul.
A seed that has lain deeply in the earth for many years
just smiles.


Dont' work too hard. Be like the earth. When the rain comes, the earth only has to open herself up to the rain.  Let the rain of the Dharma come in and penetrate the seeds that are buried in your consciousness. Your teacher cannot give you the truth; the truth is already in you. Open yourself - body, mind and heart - so that his teachings will penetrate your own seeds of understanding and enlightenment. If you let his words enter you, the soil and the seeds will do the rest.



The Three Streams:
  1. Source Buddhism - includes all the teachings the Buddha gave during his lifetime. 140 years after his Great Passing Away the Sangha* divided into two schools. 
  2. Many-Schools Buddhism
  3. Mahayana Buddhism
For 400 years during and after the Buddha's lifetime, his teachings were only passed on verbally. After that, monks in Sri Lanka began writing on palm leaves. One monk only memorised the whole canon. This makes us a little uneasy knowing that an arrogant monk may not have been the best one to pass on the teachings of the Buddha.

Even during his lifetime there were those such as the monk who did not understand the Buddha's teachings and passed them on incorrectly. Many did not understand the deepest meanings, and some forgot or changed words before they were written down. Before the Buddha attained full realisation of the Path, he tried different methods to suppress his mind, and they did not work.

"I thought, Why don't I grit my teeth, press my tongue
against my palate, and use my mind to repress my mind?
Then, as a wrestler might take hold of the head or the
shoulders of someone weaker, and in order to restrain
him, he has to hold him down constantly without letting
go for a moment, so I gritted my teeth, pressed my tongue
against my palate, and used my mind to suppress my mind.
As I did this, I was bathed in sweat. Although I was not
lacking in strength, although I maintained mindfulness and
did not fall from mindfullness, my body and my mind were
not at peace. I was exhausted. This caused other feelings of
pain to arise in me besides the pain associated with the
austerities, and I was not able to tame my mind."

The Buddha was telling us not to practice in this way. Yet another passage was later inserted into other discourses to convey exactly the opposite meaning.
Often we need to study lots of discourses and compare them to understand the true teachings of the Buddha.
Like stringing precious gems together to make a necklace. We see each sutra* in light of the whole body of the teachings. By the time the discourses were written down, there were 18 or 20 schools, and each had it's own recension. These schools did not tear the teachings apart, but were threads of a single garment. Two still exist today: Tamrashatiya and Sarvastivada canons. By comparing these, we can see which teachings preceded Buddhism's dividing into schools.

Mahayana Buddhism arose in the 1st or 2nd century BCE after the Buddha's passing. The Dharma became the exclusive domain of monks and nuns and laypeople were limited to supporting the ordained Sangha with food, shelter, clothing and medicines. The ideal of the Mahayanists was that of the bodhisattva*, who taught and practised for the benefit of all.

The three streams complement each other. It was impossible for Source Buddhism to remember everything. Like all traditions, Buddhism needs to renew itself regularly in order to stay  alive and grow.

A sutra or a Dharma talk is not insight in and of itself. If you use a map to get somewhere, once you get there, you can put the map away and enjoy your destination. If you spend all your time with the map, you will miss the reality. The Buddha said many times, "My teaching is like a finger pointing to the moon. Do not mistake the finger for the moon."

Sutras are essential guides for our own intelligence and the help of a teacherand a Sangha to understand the true meaning and put it into practice. After reading a sutra or any spirtitual text, we should feel lighter, not heavier. Buddhist teachings are meant to awaken our true self, not merely to add to our storehouse of knowledge.

Sometimes, the Buddha refused to answer a question posed to him. For example, "Is there a self?" and the Buddha did not say anything. The man persisted, "Do you mean there is not self?" The Buddha still said nothing. Finally the man left. Buddha's assistant said, "Lord, you always teach that there is no self. Why did you not say so?"
The Buddha said that he did not reply because the man was looking for a theory, not a way to remove obstacles." Archeologists repair broken statues by specialising in studying the art of that time. We must do the same. If we have an overall view of the teachings of the Buddha, whe a peice is missing or has been added, we have to recognise it and repair the damage. 





*bodhisattva:  is the embodiment of bodhichitta -- the compassionate wish to realize enlightenment for all beings, not just oneself.
There are bodhisattvas who are transcendent beings of art and sacred texts, and there are bodhisattvas who are ordinary human beings. Bodhisattvas vow to remain in the world until all beings are enlightened and may enter Nirvana together.
For Mahayana Buddhists, a bodhisattva is the ideal of practice. In many schools of Mahayana, clergy and laypeople alike take the Bodhisattva Vows. There are many variations and translations of the vows; this is just one:
Quan Yin
Beings are numberless; I vow to liberate them.
Delusions are inexhaustible; I vow to end them.
Dharma gates are boundless; I vow to enter them.
The Buddha Way is unobtainable; I vow to obtain it.  

*Sangha: Buddhist monastic order, traditionally composed of four groups: monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen. The sangha is a part—together with the Buddha and the dharma (teaching)—of the Threefold Refuge, a basic creed of Buddhism.


*Sutra: The name sutra (Sanskrit for "thread") in Buddhism originally was given only to the sermons of the historical Buddha. The sutras were recited from memory by the Buddha's disciple Anandaat the First Buddhist Council. From Ananda's memory they were collected in the part of theTripitaka called the Sutra-pitaka. 
The Mahayana Sutras, however, were most likely written no earlier than five centuries after the death of the Buddha, possibly later, which would seem to make them unlikely candidates for the title.
Even so, they were written in the style of the original sutras as if Ananda had recited them. Those later sutras considered essential texts by at least some Mahayana schools are included in what is called the Northern or Mahayana Canon of sutras.
To confuse matters further, there are some texts that are called sutras but are not. An example of this is the "Platform Sutra," which contains the biography and discourses of the 7th century Ch'an master Hui Neng. The work is one of the treasures of Ch'an and Zen literature. It is generally and cheerfully agreed that the Platform Sutra is not, in fact, a sutra, but it is called a sutra nonetheless.



    

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

The River

"Enlightenment, for a wave in the ocean,
is the moment the wave realises it is water."

Thich Nhat Hanh




Once upon a time there was a beautiful river finding her way among the hills, forests, and meadows.She began by being a joyful stream of water, a spring always dancing and singing as she ran down from the top of the mountain. She was very young at the time, and as she came to the lowland she slowed down. She was thinking about going to the ocean. As she grew up, she learned to look beautiful, winding gracefully among the hills and meadows.

One day she noticed the clouds within herself; clouds of all sorts of colors and forms. She did nothing during these days but chase after clouds. She wanted to possess a cloud, to have one for herself. But clouds float and travel in the sky, and they are always changing their form. Sometimes they look like an overcoat, sometimes like a horse. Because of the nature of impermanence within the clouds, the river suffered very much. Her pleasure, her joy had become just chasing after clouds, one after another, but despair, anger, and hatred became her life.

Then one day a strong wind came and blew away all the clouds in the sky. The sky became completely empty. Our river thought that life was not worth living, for there were no longer any clouds to chase after. She wanted to die: “If there are no clouds, why should I be alive?” But how can a river take her own life?

That night the river had the opportunity to go back to herself for the first time. She had been running for so long after something outside of herself that she had never seen herself. That night was the first opportunity for her to hear her own crying, the sounds of water crashing against the banks of the river. Because she was able to listen to her own voice, she discovered something quite important.

She realized that what she had been looking for was already in herself. She found out that clouds are nothing but water. Clouds are born from water and will return to water. And she found out that she herself is also water.

The next morning when the sun was in the sky, she discovered something beautiful. She saw the blue sky for the first time. She had never noticed it before. She had only been interested in clouds, and she had missed seeing the sky, which is the home of all the clouds. Clouds are impermanent, but the sky is stable. She realized that the immense sky had been within her heart since the very beginning. This great insight brought her peace and happiness. As she saw the vast wonderful blue sky, she knew that her peace and stability would never be lost again.

That afternoon the clouds returned, but this time she did not want to possess any of them. She could see the beauty of each cloud, and she was able to welcome all of them. When a cloud came by, she would greet him or her with loving kindness. When that cloud wanted to go away, she would wave to him or her happily and with loving kindness. She realized that all clouds are her. She didn’t have to choose between the clouds and herself. Peace and harmony existed between her and the clouds.

That evening something wonderful happened. When she opened her heart completely to the evening sky she received the image of the full moon–beautiful, round, like a jewel within herself. She had never imagined that she could receive such a beautiful image.

There is a very beautiful poem in Chinese: “The fresh and beautiful moon is traveling in the utmost empty sky. When the mind-rivers of living beings are free, that image of the beautiful moon will reflect in each of us.”

This was the mind of the river at that moment. She received the image of that beautiful moon within her heart, and water, clouds, and moon took each other’s hands and practiced walking meditation slowly, slowly to the ocean.

There is nothing to chase after. We can go back to ourselves, enjoy our breathing, our smiling, ourselves, and our beautiful environment.

The River by Thich Nhat Hanh from Peace Is Every Step






I have often thought how lovely and how strange a river is. A river is a river, always there, and yet the water flowing through it is never the same water and is never still. It’s always changing and is always on the move. And over time the river itself changes too. It widens and deepens as it rubs and scours, gnaws and kneads, eats and bores its way through the land. Even the greatest rivers- the Nile and the Ganges, the Yangtze and he Mississippi, the Amazon and the great grey-green greasy Limpopo all set about with fever trees-must have been no more than trickles and flickering streams before they grew into mighty rivers.

Are people like that? I wondered. Am I like that? Always me, like the river itself, always flowing but always different, like the water flowing in the river, sometimes walking steadily along andante, sometimes surging over rapids furioso, sometimes meandering wit hardly any visible movement tranquilo, lento, ppp pianissimo, sometimes gurgling giacoso with pleasure, sometimes sparkling brillante in the sun, sometimes lacrimoso, sometimes appassionato, sometimes misterioso, sometimes pesante, sometimes legato, sometimes staccato, sometimes sospirando, sometimes vivace, and always, I hope, amoroso.
Do I change like a river, widening and deepening, eddying back on myself sometimes, bursting my banks sometimes when there’s too much water, too much life in me, and sometimes dried up from lack of rain? Will the I that is me grow and widen and deepen? Or will I stagnate and become an arid riverbed? Will I allow people to dam me up and confine me to wall so that I flow only where they want? Will I allow them to turn me into a canal to use for they own purposes? Or will I make sure I flow freely, coursing my way through the land and ploughing a valley of my own?





“The river is one of my favorite metaphors, the symbol of the great flow of Life Itself. The river begins at Source, and returns to Source, unerringly. This happens every single time, without exception. We are no different.” 
― Jeffrey R. AndersonThe Nature of Things - Navigating Everyday Life with Grace


“Ask the river, where it comes from? You will get no answer. Ask the river, where is it going? You will get no answer, because the river lives inside this very moment; neither in the past nor in the future, in this very moment only!” 
― Mehmet Murat ildan


     

What do Buddhists believe?

I am new to Buddhism, and although I have yearned to know more for over half my life, I have only recently had the extreme good fortune* to have found the most honest, loyal and loving teacher (sensei). He has taken me under his wing and selflessly devoted himself to teaching this most undeserving and humble student. 




 “When the student is ready, the teacher will appear” ~ Buddha



 So...


"What do Buddhists believe?"
I was taken aback by my own question. What do Buddhists believe? No one had told me I had to believe any particular thing. Indeed, in Zen Buddhism rigidly held beliefs are considered to be barriers to realization.

Guiding Means

Beginners to Buddhism are handed lists of doctrines -- the Four Noble Truths, the Five Skandhas, the Eightfold Path. One is told tounderstand the teachings and practice them. However, "believing in" doctrines about Buddhism is not the point of Buddhism.
What the historical Buddha taught was a method for understanding oneself and the world in a different way. The many lists of doctrines are not meant to be accepted on blind faith. The Venerable Thich Nhat Hanh, a Vietnamese Zen master, says "Do not be idolatrous about or bound to any doctrine, theory, or ideology, even Buddhist ones. Buddhist systems of thought are guiding means; they are not absolute truth."
The absolute truth of which Thich Nhat Hanh speaks cannot be contained in words and concepts. Thus, merely believing in words and concepts is not the Buddhist path. There is no point in believing in reincarnation/rebirth, for example. Rather, one practices Buddhism in order to realize a self not subject to birth and death.

Many Boats, One River

To say that doctrines and teachings shouldn't be accepted on blind faith doesn't mean they aren't important. The myriad teachings of Buddhism are like maps to follow on a spiritual journey, or a boat to carry you across a river. Daily meditation or chanting may seem pointless, but when practiced with sincerity they have a real impact on your life and outlook.
And to say that Buddhism is not about believing things doesn't mean there are no Buddhist beliefs. Over the centuries Buddhism has developed diverse schools with distinctive, and sometimes contradictory, doctrines. Often you might read that "Buddhists believe" such and such a thing, when in fact that doctrine belongs only to one school and not to all of Buddhism.
To compound confusion further, throughout Asia one can find a kind of folk Buddhism in which the Buddha and other iconic characters from Buddhist literature are believed to be divine beings who can hear prayers and grant wishes. Clearly, there are Buddhists with beliefs. Focusing on those beliefs will teach you little about Buddhism, however.
If you want to learn about Buddhism, (and I most certainly do) it is suggested that you put aside all assumptions. Put aside assumptions about Buddhism, and then assumptions about religion. Put aside assumptions about the nature of the self, of reality, of existence. Keep yourself open to new understanding. Whatever beliefs you hold, hold in an open hand and not a tight fist. Just practice, and see where it takes you.
And remember the Zen saying -- "The hand pointing to the moon is not the moon".





*Gautama Buddha, the founder of Buddhism, taught his followers not to believe in luck. The view which was taught by Gautama Buddha states that all things which happen must have a cause, either material or spiritual, and do not occur due to luck, chance or fate. The idea of moral causality, karma (Pali: kamma), is central in Buddhism. In the Sutta Nipata, the Buddha is recorded as having said the following about selling luck:
Whereas some religious men, while living of food provided by the faithful make their living by such low arts, such wrong means of livelihood as palmistry, divining by signs, interpreting dreams ... bringing good or bad luck ... invoking the goodness of luck ... picking the lucky site for a building, the monk Gautama refrains from such low arts, such wrong means of livelihood.